رشد مهارت نوشتار در فارسی زبانان 13- 18 ساله با نگاهی به الگوهای نحوی و مکث

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش آموخته ی کارشناسی ارشد زبان شناسی همگانی

2 استادیار گروه زبان شناسی- دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

چکیده

مهارت نوشتاری توانایی برقراری ارتباط و انتقال اطلاعات و عقاید، به کمک مجموعه­ای از نشانه­های نوشتاری است. یکی از مسائل در حوزه­ی­ آموزش زبان، بررسی تفاوت­های رشد مهارت نوشتاری افراد مختلف در حوزه­ای خاص می­­باشد. بر این اساس در پژوهش حاضر تفاوت­های مهارت نوشتاری در چارچوب مکث و همچنین الگوهای نحوی مورد بررسی قرار میگیرد. برای جمعآوری داده­های مورد نظر ابتدا 30 دانش­آموز دبیرستانی از تربت جام به­صورت تصادفی انتخاب شدند (15 نفر دختر و 15 نفر پسر). سپس از همه­ی شرکت­کنندگان خواسته شد که با استفاده از نرم­افزار واژه­پرداز متن، حدود یک بند درباره­­ی پدیده­ی­ تقلب در مدارس و راه­های پیشگیری از آن بنویسند. برای جلوگیری از تداخل و انحراف در نتایج، شرکت کنندگان از لحاظ سن، جنسیت، تعداد افراد هر گروه، سطح آشنایی با رایانه و نرم­افزار واژه­پرداز، سطح نمرات و معدل تحصیلی یکسان­سازی شدند و به­طور تصادفی در سه گروه سنی قرار گرفتند. درنهایت نتایج حاصل از بررسی یافته­ها نشان می­داد که فارسی­زبانان 13 تا 18 ساله در عواملی همچون مدت زمان نگارش متن، تعداد کلمات به­کار رفته، الگوهای مکث، میزان دیرش مکث، جایگاه نحوی وقوع آن و نیز ویرایش متن به­ هنگام نوشتن متن با یکدیگر تفاوت دارند و با افزایش سن این تفاوت­ها بیشتر می­شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Development of Writing Skill in 13-18 Years Old Persian Speakers:Pause and Syntax Patterns

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hamid Reza Barabari 1
  • Atiyeh Kamyabi Gol 2
  • Mahmood Elyasi 2
چکیده [English]

Writing skill refers to communication through a system of written signs. One of the major issues in language teaching relates to exploring the differences in the development of this skill. The present study aimed to examine the development of writing skill in terms of pause and syntax patterns. To collect the required data, 30 high school students were randomly selected (15 females and 15 males). The students were asked to write a paragraph about cheating on exams and the ways to prevent it. To prevent interference and distortion of the results, the participants were homogenized in terms of age, gender, number of group members, level of familiarity with computers and word processing software, and also grade point averages. Then, they were randomly assigned to three groups based on age. The results indicated that 13 to 18-year-old Persian speakers were different with regards to the duration of writing, number of words used in writing, the duration of pauses, pause patterns, syntactic location of pause occurrence, and text editing while writing a text. With increasing age, these differences became more prominent.


Extended Abstract
Introduction
Writing skill means communication through a system of written signs. This skill, as well as the differences in its growth rate, is among the major issues in language and language learning studies. In fact, communicating through written language is not only a great hurdle for second/foreign language learners, but also native speakers tend to display difficulty in this area. Fromkin, Rodman and Hymes (2002) have compared speaking with writing as two major production skills and have concluded that while both skills are vital in language learning, speaking has received a great deal of research attention while writing has not received its limelight. While speaking uses various vocal signals to convey a message, writing has to use sets of arbitrary symbols to achieve the same effect and in turn is more difficult to conduct. The present study aimed to examine the development of writing skill in high school Persian native speakers in the context of pauses and pause patterns as a cognitive factor.
Literature Review
Hasanlou and Mohammadi (1388) assert that writing is one of the most complex tasks for language learners to master. In their research, they found that those who were better writers were also better speakers and that age and level of education play a vital role in the mastery of written skill.  According to Deane, Odendahl, Quinlan, Fowles, Welsh, and Bivens (2008), the way an individual writes, mirrors their understanding and recognition of vocabulary meaning and syntactic structures; overall competence; power to relay information and relate to environmental phenomena; and generally, overall cognitive development. One important variable to study during writing is pause. How long a person pauses when writing can be affected by various factors such as age, gender, level of education, cognitive growth, etc.  Myhill (2009) believes that with the advancement of age, syntactic complexities are more observable in writing. Also, sentence length and frequency of clauses and variation in clauses tend to increase with older writers.  Schilperoord (2002) is among the various scholars who have conducted extensive research in the field of pauses during writing and he believes that this important factor has not received its due attention in English. The number of studies conducted on pauses during writing in Persian is almost non-existing and to the best of the writers’ knowledge, this is one of the pioneering studies in this filed. Johanson (2009) found that the development of writing skill is age dependent and that the overall quality of the written texts by 10-18 years olds was completely different.
Methodology
To collect the required data, 30 high school students were randomly selected; among them 15 females and 15 males, respectively. It should be noted that all the participants were fluent in Persian and also had enough mastery in writing. The students were asked to write a paragraph about students' cheating issue and preventive methods in high schools. To prevent interference and distortion of the results, the participants were balanced in terms of age, gender, level of familiarity with computers and word processor software and also school grade point averages. Then they were randomly divided into three groups based on age.
Results
The results indicated that 13 to 18-year-old Persian speakers are different with regards to the duration of writing, number of words used in writing, the duration of pauses, pause patterns and place of pause occurrence as well as text editing while writing a text. In the 13-14 year old group (first group), the average time span for writing was 1671 seconds, average pause duration 936 seconds and the average number of words used was 15. In the second group (15-16 year olds), the average time span for writing was 1800 seconds, average pause duration 973 seconds and the average number of words used was 227. Finally for the last group (17-18 year olds), the average time span for writing was 2413 seconds, average pause duration 1057 seconds and the average number of words used was 331. The t-test results indicate that there is a significant difference between the first (13-14 year olds) and third (17-18 year olds) groups as regards to the average time span for writing, average pause duration and the average number of words used. No significant difference was seen between the first and second groups. The results also indicate that the first group made 460, second group 697, and the third group 1530 corrections on the texts respectively. The t-test results reveal a significant difference among all three groups. The t-test results reveal no significant difference between pause duration and correction pauses between the second and third group; however, a significant difference was observed between the first and third group.
Conclusion and Discussion
Based on the obtained results, the following conclusions can be made: 1. older participants took longer to write their texts 2. the pause duration increased with age. 3. the number of words per text increased with age. 4. with the advancement of age, the number of overall used characters and edited characters increased. 5. at the word level, with the advancement of age, the number and duration of pauses decreased; however, the results were vice versa which revealed an increase at the sentence and clause level.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Development of writing skill
  • pause
  • syntactic patterns
  • cognition
  • word processing software
حسن­لو، ژیلا و محمدی، نورالدین. (1388). خلاقیت نوشتاری و هنر نوشتن. تهران: نشر چاپار.

سیف، علی اکبر. (۱۳۷۷). تغییر رفتار و رفتاردرمانی. تهران: نشر دانا.

صفوی، کوروش. (1386). آشنایی با نظام­های نوشتاری. تهران: نشر پژواک کیوان.

 

Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Elerbaum Associates.

Chanquoy, L. (2009). Revision Processes. In: Roger Beard, Debra Myhill, Jeni Riley, and Martin Nystrand, (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of writing development (pp. 80-97). London: SAGE Publications.

Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. Praeger. USA: Duke University Press.

Deane, P., Odendahl, N., Quinlan, T., Fowles, M., Welsh, C., & Bivens, J. (2008). Cognitive models of writing: Writing proficiency as a complex integrated skill. New York: EST Press.

Ericsson, K., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long Term Memory Working. Psychology Review,  102 (2), 211-245.

Fayol, M. (1999). From on-line management problems to strategies in written composition. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Flower, L. (1980). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. M. (2002). An introduction to language. Boston, MA: Thomson Wadsworth.

Hassanlou, J., & Mohammadi, N. (2009). Creative writing and the art of writing. Tehran: Chapar Publication.

Johansson, V. (2009). Developmental aspects of text production in writing and speech. Lund Department of Linguistics and Phonetics: Lund University Publications.

Johansson, R., Johansson,V., Wengelin, A.,& Kenneth,A. (2008). Reading during writing: Four different groups of writers. Lund: Lund University, Dept.of Linguistics and Phonetics, Working Papers 53, 43-59.

Kellogg, R. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 1-26.

Matsuhashi, A. (1981). Pausing and planning: The tempo of written discourse production. Research in the Teaching of English, 25(2). 113-134.

McCutchen, D. (2000). Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 13-23.

Miller, K. (2006). The pausological study of written language production. In: G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.),  K.P.H. Sullivan, & E. Lindgren (Vol. Eds.), Studies in Writing, Computer Keystroke Logging: Methods and Applications. Oxford: Elsevier, 11-30.

Myhill, D. (2009). The SAGE handbook of writing development. London: SAGE Publications.

Safavi, K. (2007). Introduction to writing systems. Tehran: Pejvak Keivan Publication.

Saussure, F. (1964). Lettres de Ferdinand de Saussure à Antoine Meillet. E. Benveniste, (Ed). Cahier. 21. Academic.

Schilperoord, J. (2002). On the cognitive status of pauses in discourse production. In T. Olive & C. M. Levy (Eds.), Contemporary tools and techniques for studying writing (pp. 61-90). Boston: Kluwer Academic.

Seif, A. (1998). Behaviour change and psychotherapy. Tehran: Dana Publication.

Scott, C. (1988). Spoken and written syntax. In M. A.,Nippold, (Ed.). Later language development: Ages nine through nineteeen, pp. 49–95. Texas: Austin.

Wengelin, A. (2002). Text production in adults with reading and writing difficulties.Goteborg: Goteborg University Press.