فرآیندهای صداداری و بی صدایی در کودکان فارسی زبان با رشد واجی عادی و با اختلال

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

نویسنده ی مسئول، استادیارگروه آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه بین‏المللی امام خمینی (ره)

چکیده

فرآیندهای واجی، مانند واک­دارشدگی و واک­رفتگی، که در گفتار کودک رخ می­دهد، یکی از عوامل اصلی متمایز کننده­ی گفتار کودک و بزرگسال است. مطالعه­ی حاضر به بررسی و مقایسه­ی خطاهای ناشی از فرآیندهای واک‏دارشدگی و واک­رفتگی در کودکان فارسی­زبان با رشد واجی عادی و با اختلال واجی می­پردازد. همچنین، این تحقیق خطاهای واک­دارشدگی و واک­رفتگی کودکان فارسی­زبان عادی را با خطاهای کودکانی که به زبان­های دیگر سخن می­گویند، مقایسه می­کند. پنج کودک با رشد واجی عادی (2 تا 4 سال) و پنج کودک با اختلال واجی (4 تا 6 سال) در این مطالعه مقطعی شرکت کردند. کودکان عادی از مهدکودک­ها و کودکان با اختلال از کلینیک­های گفتار درمانی به روش نمونه­گیری تصادفی ساده انتخاب شدند. خطاهای واک­دارشدگی و واک­رفتگی کودکان با استفاده از آزمون «نام­گذاری تصویر» که شامل 133 تصویر بود، گرد­آوری شد. نتایج یافته­ها نشان داد که در هر دو گروه از کودکان خطاهای واک­رفتگی بیشتر از خطاهای واک­دارشدگی است. همچنین، فرآیند واک­دارشدگی در آغاز و میان واژه در هر دو گروه دیده شده است؛ اما فرآیندهای واک­رفتگی در میان واژه و واک­دارشدگی در پایان واژه فقط در کودکان با اختلال واجی ملاحظه شده است. تحلیل نتایج در چارچوب نظریه­ی بهینگی نشان داد که تفاوت­های موجود در فرآیندهای واک­دارشدگی و واک­رفتگی بین کودکان با رشد واجی عادی و با اختلال واجی، به­دلیل رده­بندی متفاوت محدودیت­های وفاداری و نشان­داری در دستور زیر بنایی آنان است. همچنین شباهت­هایی در فرآیندهای واک­دارشدگی و واک­رفتگی بین کودکان فارسی زبان و کودکانی که به دیگر زبان­ها سخن می­گویند نیز دیده شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Voicing and devoicing processes in Farsi-speaking children with typical and protracted phonological development

نویسنده [English]

  • Froogh shoshtarizade
Corresponding author, Assistant Professor, Department of English Language Teaching, Imam Khomeini International University,Qazvin, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Background and aim: One of the main factors that differentiate child speech from adults’ is the phonological processes that happen in child language, including voicing and devoicing. The present study aims to consider and compare the quality of voicing/devoicing errors occurring in Farsi-speaking children with protracted and typical phonological development. Moreover, this study compares voicing/devoicing errors of typical Farsi-speaking children with the voicing/devoicing errors of children speaking other languages.
Method: Five children with typical phonological development (2;6-4;0) and 5 children with protracted phonological development (4;6-6) participated in this qualitative cross-sectional study. The typical children were collected from nursery schools and the protracted children were recruited from speech therapy clinics in Karaj. They were chosen via convenience sampling method. Their voicing/devoicing errors were investigated using Naming-picture task (Farsi phonology test with pictures) wherein each child asked to produce 133 single words.
Results: Devoicing errors were distributed more widely than voicing errors in typical and atypical phonological development, especially in word-final position. The typical children participating in this study rarely displayed word-medial devoicing; however, atypical children illustrated several cases of it. Word-initial and medial voicing were observed in both groups of children; however, word-final voicing was merely detected in atypical children.
Conclusion: Results revealed that the differences observed in voicing/devoicing processes between children with protracted and typical phonological development is due to the different hierarchy of markedness and faithfulness constrains in their internalized grammar. Furthermore, there are major similarities in voicing process between typical Farsi-speaking children and typical children speaking other languages.
Extended Abstract 
The notion of systematicity in erroneous productions, which, at first, was presented to the field of linguistics by Stampe (1969), was later adapted and named phonological processes by the authors like Ingram (1976). Voicing and Devoicing are two known phonological processes which are from substitution category in which certain sounds or sound classes that exist in the target phonological system do not appear in the children’s system or may merely appear in certain contexts. This more restricted inventory results in some specific substitution patterns including voicing and devoicing. According to Grunwell (1985) and Stole-Gammon and Dunn (1985), the study of phonological processes highlights the correlation between the adult and child production, and presents a framework to describe patterns of typical and protracted phonological acquisition. In view of that, the present study aims to consider Voicing and Devoicing phonological processes in Farsi-speaking children with typical phonological development (TD) and protracted phonological development (PD) that have not been studied so far. To examine the errors produced through voicing/devoicing processes by the above mentioned groups of Persian-speaking children, this study, first, considers the types of voicing/devoicing errors found in Persian children with typical and protracted phonological development and then compares the error patterns found in the two groups with each other. Moreover, the results will be examined within the framework of Optimality Theory (OT) (Prince and Smolensky, 1993; McCarty and Prince, 1994, 1995) to infer the underlying internal grammar that creates such voicing/devoicing patterns in children with typical and protracted phonological development. The results of this study also will be compared with the results found in the children speaking languages other than Farsi wherever it is applicable.
The participants in this cross-sectional study are five children diagnosed with functional (non-organic) phonological disorder (PD) (Se, Ti, Me, Ze, and He) who range in age from 4:6 years to 6 years, and five children with typical phonological development (TD) (El, Al, Sa, Ma, Ro) ranging in age from 2:6 years to 4 years. All the children were selected after considering their physical and mental health and after receiving written consent from their parents. In order to collect the necessary data from Farsi speaking children, a specific production test, called, Naming-Picture Task (NPT) has been applied.The words used in this test were selected through four criteria: a) all of them are related to the objects and animals that children generally are familiar with; b) they are all concrete names and let the researcher present them in pictures to the participants; c) the selected target words cover all phonemes and syllables in Farsi; d) It has also been attempted not to make the test too lengthy because it may make the child tired and reduces the accuracy of the produced data. Using these criteria and the results of a pilot study, 132 words were elected for NPT. The pictures used to represent the words in NPT were mainly provided from a book named “painted children dictionary” (Rotako, 2004). The data was collected by NPT from both groups of children during two-three separate sessions, depending on the age of the child and his/her cooperation in answering the questions. All the answers were recorded by means of a high quality solid state sound recorder (Samsung Voice Recorder model YP-VP1).
 Results showed that both voicing and devoicing errors occurred in TD and PD children; however, the occurrence of devoicing errors was more than voicing errors in both groups. Furthermore, results showed that the place of target segments in the words, i.e. word- initial, medial, and final positions, had an effect on the quality and quantity of voicing/devoicing errors. One of the most frequent cases of devoicing was word-final devoicing that was observed in both PD and TD groups. Devoicing was also detected in word-initial position in both groups; however, these processes had a higher frequency in PD compared to TD children. Voicing errors occurred in early stages of the phonological development in typically developing children and the frequency of these errors decreases from the youngest child (El, 2;9) to the eldest child (Ro 4;0). However, these errors were observed in all PD children irrespective of their age and though they are all elder than the oldest TD child. This study also examined the number of voicing/devoicing errors in codas and onsets. Though, onsets are not always in the beginning of words and codas in the end of words, but the findings related to these places have been similar to the results observed in segments that have been in word-initial and word-final positions.
The data collected from the present study investigating voicing/devoicing processes in Farsi-speaking children with typical (TD) and protracted phonological development (PD) was primarily examined in OT frame work and it is concluded that the differences observed in voicing/devoicing processes between PD and TD groups is rooted in the differences in the hierarchy of markedness and faithfulness constrains in their internalized grammar. Moreover, the comparison of the results of this study with the results of similar studies on children speaking languages other than Farsi illustrated similarities in voicing process between them. Similar to children speaking other languages, the TD and PD children demonstrated more devoicing errors than voicing errors which supports the claim that voiceless segments serve as defaults for most children. In addition, this study illustrated that there is a general tendency for voicing in onsets and devoicing in codas which supports the onset-coda asymmetry suggested by Dinnsen (1996). The age-wise decrease in the frequency of voicing errors found in the TD children’s data confirmed the previous finding that voicing errors normally occur in early stages of phonological development and by 3;6 years most children are correctly producing the voicing contrast (Richtsmeier, 2010). However, the existence of voicing errors in PD children, irrespective of their age, displayed that the inverse relation between the frequency of voicing errors and age does not probably apply to atypical phonological development.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Voicing
  • devoicing
  • Farsi-speaking
  • phonological development
  • protracted
  • typical
ایمانی، آسیه، علی نژاد، بتول. (1393). حذف در گفتار کودکان 2-5 ساله فارسی زبان، رویکردی واج­شناختی بر پایه­ی نظریه­ی بهینگی. مجموعه مقالات دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی. 331، صص: 217-238.
جلیله‌وند، ناهید، دمرچی، زینب، محمودی بختیاری، بهروز، کیهانی، محمدرضا.  (1390). بررسی فرایندهای واجی کودکان 4 تا 6 ساله­ی فارسی‌زبان. مجلهزبانو زبان­شناسی. 7 (13)، صص:51-60.
شیرازی، طاهره سیما، مهدی پور، نیره، مهری، آذر و رهگذر، مهدی. (1388). بررسی فرآیندهای واجی کودکان فارسی زبان 2 تا 4 ساله.  توانبخشی. 10 ( 1)، صص: 17-23.
صالح ریاحی دهکردی، مریم، لطفی، احمدرضا، علی نژاد، بتول. (1394). مطالعه رشد واجی در کودکان سه تا پنج ساله در چارچوب نظریه­ی بهینگی. حسینی معصوم، سیدمحمد؛ شریفی، شهلا، مجموعه مقالات سومین همایش ملی زبان­شناسی و آموزش زبان فارسی (صص: 215-239). تهران: نویسه پارسی.
میرمسیب،الهام، البرزی ورکی، پرویز. (1390). تحلیل فرایندهای واجی در فارسی زبانان 2 تا 4 ساله شهر تهران بر پایه­ی نظریه­ی واج­شناسی تولیدی. پژوهش­های زبانشناختی در زبان­های خارجی. 1 (1)، صص: 113- 128              .
References:
Babatsouli, E., Ingram, D., & Sotiropoulos, D. (2014). Phonological word proximity in child speech development. Chaotic Modeling and Simulation. 4(3), 295–313.
Barlow, J. A. & Gierut, J. (1999). Optimality theory in phonological acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 1482–1498.
Barlow, J. A. & Keare, A. R. (2008). Acquisition of final voicing: An acoustic and theoretical account. In A.W. Farris–Trimble & D.A. Dinnsen (Eds.), IUWPL6: Phonological opacity effects in optimality theory (pp. 81–97). Bloomington, IN: IULC Publications.
Barlow, J. A. (2001). Optimality theory and the assessment and treatment of phonological disorders. Speech, Language, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 242–256.
Baudouin de Courtenay, J. (1895/1972). An attempt at a theory of phonetic alternations. In E. Stankiewicz (Ed. & trans.), A Baudouin de Courtenay anthology (pp. 144–212) Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Beckman J., Jessen, M., & Ringen, C. (2006). Phonetic Variation and Phonological Theory: German Fricative Voicing. In D. Baumer, D. Montero & M. Scanlon (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 76–86). Somerville, MA:Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Beckman, J., Jessen, M., & Ringen, C. (2009). German fricatives: Coda devoicing or positional faithfulness. Phonology,26, 231–268.
Berg, T. (1995). Word-final voicing in the history of English: A case of unnatural phonology. English Studies, 76 (2), 185-201.
Bernhardt, B. H., & Stemberger J. P. (2000).Workbook in nonlinear phonology for clinical application. Austin, TX: PRO–ED.
Bernthal, J. E., Bankson, N. W., & Flipsen, P. (2009). Articulation and phonological disorders: Speech sound disorders in children. Boston, Mass: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
Blevins, J. (2004). Evolutionary Phonology: the emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
Bowen, C. (2009). Children's speech sound disorders. Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell.
Celce–Murcia, M. (1978). The simultaneous acquisition of English and French in a two–year–old child. In E. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 38–53). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Chappell, W. (2011). The intervocalic voicing of /s/ in Ecuadorian Spanish. In J. Michnowics & R. Dodsworth (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistic (pp. 57–64). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project,
Cho, T. & Keating, P. A.  (2001). Articulatory and acoustic studies of domain-initial strengthening in Korean. Journal of phonetics, 29, 155-190. 
Cser, A. (1996). The strengthening of voiced fricatives in Germanic. The Even Yearbook 2, 1–8, English Dept/Budapest Publications.
Davidson, L. (2015). Patterns of voicing in American English voiced obstruents in connected speech. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (1-9). Glasgow, UK: the University of Glasgow.
DiCanio, C. T. (2012). The phonetics of fortis and lenis consonants in Itunyoso Trique. International Journal of American Linguistics, 78 (2), 239–272.
Dinnsen, D. A. (1996). Context–sensitive underspecification and the acquisition of phonemic contrasts. Journal of Child Language, 23, 57–79.
Dinnsen, D. A., & O’Conner, K. M. (2001a). Implicationally related error patterns and the selection of treatment targets. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 257–270.
Dinnsen, D. A., & O’Conner, K. M. (2001b). Typological predictions in developmental phonology. Journal of Child Language, 28, 597–628.
Dinnsen, D. A. (1996). Context–sensitive underspecification and the acquisition of phonemic contrasts. Journal of Child Language, 23, 57–79.
Dodd, B. (1995). Children with speech disorder: Defining the problem. In B. Dodd (Ed.), Differential diagnosis and treatment of children with speech disorder (pp. 1–19). SanDiego, CA: Singular.

Dodd, B., Holm, A., Hua, Z., & Crosbie, S. (2003). Phonological development: A normative study of British English–speaking children. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 17 (8), 617–643.

Fougeron, C. & Keating, P. (1997). Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101 (6), 3728-3740.
Gierut, J. A. & Morrisette, M. L. (2005). The clinical significance of optimality theory for phonological disorders. Top Lang. Disorders, 25 (3), 266–280.
Gilbert, D. (2001). Conflicting phonologically based and phonetically based constraints in the analysis of liquid–nasal substitutions. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 15 (1/2), 23–28.
Gonet, W. (2001). Obstruent Voicing in English and Polish. Pedagogical Perspective. International Journal of English Studies, 1(1) 73-92.
Grijzenhout, J. (2000). Voicing and devoicing in English, German, and Dutch; evidence for domain–specific identity constraints.  SFB 282 working paper 116, 2000, 'Two papers on constraint domains’, HHU Düsseldorf.
Grunwell, P. (1985). Phonological Assessment of Child Speech (PACS). Windsor: NFER– NELSON.
Gurevich, N. (2004). Lenition and contrast: the functional consequences of certain phonetically conditioned sound changes. London: Routledge (Taylor & Francis).
Imani, A., & Alinezhad, B. (2014). Deletion in the speech of 2-5 year old children based on Optimaliry Theory. Proceedings of the 9th national conference of Iranian Linguistics, Tehran, 217-238. [In Persian]
Ingram, D. (1974). Phonological rules in young children.  Journal of child language, 1, 49–64.
Ingram, D. (1976). Phonological disability in children. London: Edward Arnold.
Jakobson, R., Gunnar C., Fant, M., & Halle, M. (1961). Preliminaries to Speech Analysis. The Distinctive Features and their Correlates (4th ed.). Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
Jakobson, R. (1963). Implications of language universals for linguistics. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language: report of a conference held at Dobbs Ferry, New York, April 1961 (pp. 13-15). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
 Jakobson, R. (1968). Child language, aphasia, and phonological universals. Trans.  A.R. Keiler, The Hague: Mouton.
Jalilevand, N., Damarchi,Z., Mahmoudi Bakhtiari, B., & Keihani, M. R. (2011). Study of phonological processes of 4-6 years old Persian speaking children. Language and Linguistics, 7 (13), 51-60. [In Persian]
Jansen, W. (2007). Phonological ‘voicing’, phonetic voicing, and assimilation in English. Language Sciences, 29, 270–293.
Jany, C. (2010). Assimilatory processes in Chuxnabán Mixe. Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics, 21, 14–21.
Jesney, K. (2007). Child chain shifts as faithfulness to input prominence. In B. Alyona, M. Luisa & U. Mari (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd conference on generative approaches to language acquisition North America (GALANA) (pp. 188–199). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Kager, R. (1999). Optimality theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keating, P., Cho, T., Fougeron, C., & Hsu, C. S. (2000). Domain–initial articulatory strengthening in four languages. In J. Local, R. Ogden & R. Temple (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology 6 (pp. 143–161). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kewley–Port, D., & Preston, M. S. (1974). Early apical stop production: A voice onset time analysis. Journal of Phonetics, 2, 195–210.
Kim, J., & Chin, S. B. (2008). Fortition and lenition patterns in the acquisition of obstruents by children with cochlear implants. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 22, 233–251.
Kim, S. (2001). The interaction between prosodic domain and segmental properties: domain initial strengthening of fricatives and Post Obstruent Tensing rule in Korean (MA thesis). University of California, Los Angeles.
Kirchner, R. (1998). An effort–based approach to consonant lenition (PhD Dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.
Kulikov, V. (2012). Voicing and voice assimilation in Russian stops (PhD dissertation). University of Iowa
Lavoie, L. (2001). Consonant strength: phonological patterns and phonetic manifestations. New York: Garland.
Lin, S. C. (1971). Phonetic development of Chinese infants. Acta Psychologica Taiwanica 13, 191­­­–195.
Locke J. L. (1980). Mechanisms of phonological development in children: Maintenance, learning, and loss. Papers from the sixteenth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 220–238.
Locke, J. L. (1983). Phonological acquisition and change. New York: Academic Press.
McCarthy, J. & Prince, A. (1994). The emergence of the unmarked: optimality in prosodic morphology. Proceedings of the NELS, 24, 333–379.
McCarthy, J. & Prince, A. (1995). Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In J. N. Beckman, L. W. Dickey & S. Urbanczyk (Eds.), Papers in optimality theory. University of Massachusetts occasional papers in linguistics (18, 249–384). Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistics Student Association.
McCarthy, J. J. (2008). Doing Optimality Theory: Applying theory to data. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Mirmosayeb, E. & Alborzi Waraki, P. (2011). Phonological process analysis in 2-4 year Old Persian speakers in Tehran based on productive phonological theory. Linguistic Research in Foreign Languages ​​(Foreign Languages ​​Research), 1 (1), 111-128. [In Persian]
Nielsen, K. (2012)Japanese consecutive devoicing as a phonetic process: the relative contribution of conditioning factors and its speaker variability. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 111, 162-176.
Pape, D., Mooshammer, C., Hoole, P., & Fuchs, S. (2006). Devoicing of word-initial stops: A consequence of the following vowel? In J. Harrington & M. Tabain (Eds.), Speech production: Models, phonetic processes, and techniques (pp. 207-230). New York: Psychology Press.
Pape, D., & Jesus, L. (2011). Devoicing of phonologically voiced obstruents: Is European Portuguese different from other Romance languages? Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2011), Hong Kong, China, 1566–1569.
Pape, D., Mooshammer, C., Hoole, P., & Fuchs, S. (2003). Devoicing of word–initial stops: a consequence of the following vowel? Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Speech Production, Sydney, 207–212
Prince, A. & Smolensky, P. (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell, reprinted 2002, 2004.
Richtsmeier, P. (2010). Child phoneme errors are not substitutions, Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics (TWPL), 33, 1-15. Retrieved from
          https://twpl.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/twpl/article/view/6889/10738

Rotako, T. (2004). The children colourful dictionary. Trans. Z. Esfehani, Tehran, Ghadyani Publication Institute.

Safaiean, A., Jalilevand, N., Ebrahimipour, M., Asleshirin, E., & Hiradfar, M. (2017). Speech intelligibility after repair of cleft lip and palate. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran (MJIRI), 31 (1), 1-5.
Saleh, R. M., Lotfi, A., & Alinezhad, B. (2014). A Study of the 3-5 children’s phonological development in Optimality Theory. Proceedings of the 3rd national conference on Linguistics and Teaching Persian Language, Mashhad, 215-239. [In Persian]
Samare, Y. (1992). The phonetics of the Farsi language. Tehran: Markaze Nashre Daneshgahi.
Scherer, N. J., Williams,L., Stoel-Gammon, C., & Kaiser, A. (2012). Assessment of Single-Word Production for Children under Three Years of Age: Comparison of Children with and without Cleft Palate. International Journal of Otolaryngology, Vol. 2012, 1-8.
Shirazi, S. T., Mehri, A., Mehdi-Pour, N., & Rahgozar, M. (2009). Phonological processes of 2-4 years old Farsi children. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal. Jrehab, 10 (1), 17-23. [In Persian]
Shooshtaryzadeh, F. & Pandey, P. K. S. (2015). Consonant harmony in children acquiring Farsi; typical vs. atypical phonological development. In E. Babatsuli & D. Ingram (Eds), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Monolingual and Bilingual Speech (pp. 316-327).Chania, Greece: Institute of Monolingual and Bilingual Speech
Shooshtaryzadeh, F. (2016). Sonority and cluster reduction in typical and atypical phonological development in Farsi. In M. J. Ball & N. Müller (Eds.), Challenging sonority: cross-linguistic evidence (376-396). Equinox Publishing Ltd.
Shooshtaryzadeh, F. (2017). Local assimilation in children acquiring Farsi: A study of typical versus atypical phonological development. In E. Babatsouli, D. Ingram & N. Muller (Eds.), Crosslinguistic Encounters in Language Acquisition: Typical and Atypical Development (249-276). Multilingual Matters.
Shriberg, L. D., Austin, D., Lewis, B. A., McSweeny, J. L., & Wilson, D. L. (1997). The percentage of consonants correct (PCC) metric: Extensions and reliability data. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40 (4), 708–722.
Sieczkowska, J., Möbius, B., & Dogil, G. (2010): Specification in Context – Devoicing Processes in Polish, French, American English and German Sonorants. Proceedings of Interspeech, Japan, p. 1549-1552.
Smith, J. (1997). Noun faithfulness: On the privileged behavior of nouns in phonology, ROA–242.
Stampe, D. (1969). The acquisition of phonetic representation. Papers from the fifth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 433–444.
Stampe, D. (1973). A Dissertation on natural phonology (PhD Dissertation). University of Chicago, New York: Garland Press.
Stemberger, J. p. & Bernhardt, B. H.  (1998). Handbook of phonological development from the perspective of constraint–based nonlinear phonology. San Diego: Academic Press.
Stemberger, J. p. & Bernhardt, B. H. (1999). The emergence of faithfulness. In B. Mac Whinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 417–448) Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stoel–Gammon, C. & Dunn, C. (1985). Normal and disordered phonology in children. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Ueda, I., & Davis, S. (2001). The acquisition of Japanese ‘r’. Gengo Kenkyu, 119, 111–138.
Vanvik, A. (1971). The phonetic–phonemic development of a Norwegian child. Norsk Tidsskrift Sprogvienskap, 24, 269­­­–325.
Velleman, S. (2009). Figures, Tables, Forms. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40(4), 708–722.
Velten, H. V. (1943). The growth of phonemic and lexical patterns in infant language. Language, 19, 281­­­–292.
Viana, M. (1984). The acquisition of the phonology of Brazilian Portuguese with particular reference to stop consonants (PhD Dissertation). University of Reading (England).
Wren, Y. & Roulstone, S. (2008). A comparison between computer and tabletop delivery of phonology therapy. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10 (5), 346-363.
Zamma, H. (1996). German Final Devoicing in Optimality Theory. Tsukuba English Studies,15, 1–22.
Zanichelli, L. & Gil, D. (2011). Percentage of Consonants Correct (PCC) in children with and without hearing impairment. J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol, 23(2), 107-1