A Study on φ-features in Persian Learners’ Speaking and a Challenge in Minimalist Program

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

---

Abstract

In Minimalist Program (MP), person, number and gender are called φ-features. Since Persian does not have a feature for gender, this study explored person and number features in Persian learners’ speaking. φ-features play a key role in subject-verb agreement. This study examined subject-verb agreement in Persian learners’ speaking. 14 Persian language students who were in elementary 2 level of Dehkhoda Institute participated in structured interviews. The purpose was to determine the variables which related to the φ-features in learners’ speaking. The study examined the effects of three factors on subject-verb agreement in learners’ speaking: 1) The accessibility/inaccessibility of φ-features in the first language, 2) pro-drop in Persian 3) The presence of non-subject pronoun in Persian sentences. Furthermore, this study analyzed the influence of agreement errors or lack of syntactic interpretation of φ-features on semantic interpretation. Semantic interpretation refers to the meaning of person and number features for Persian language learners. The results of t-test analysis showed that 1) the existence of person and number features in learners’ first language had a positive effect on accessibility and acquisition of these features in Persian, 2) there were more errors in subject-verb agreement in pro-drop sentences in which subject had been deleted, 3) and there were more errors in subject-verb agreement whenever, in addition to subject, there was a non-subject pronoun in the sentence. Furthermore, qualitative analysis based on MP showed that, sometimes in the absence of subject-verb agreement or syntactic interpretation, the semantic interpretation of person and number features is accessible which presents a challenge to MP.   

Keywords

References

دبیرمقدم، م (1383). زبان‌شناسی نظری پیدایش و تکوین دستور زایشی، ویراست دوم، تهران: انتشارات سمت.
Adger, D. (2003). Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Braidi, S. M. (1999). The Acquisition of Second Language Syntax, London: Arnold.
Bruhn de Garavito, J. (2003). Learners' Competence May Be More Accurate Than We Think: Spanish L2 and Agreement Morphology, In Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2002), ed. Liceras, J. M. et al., 17-23, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. At www.lingref.com, document #1024.
Chomsky, N. (1999). Derivation by Phase, In Ken Hale: a Life in Language, ed. Kenstowicz, M. (2001), Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 1-52.
Ellis, R. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Franceshina, F. (2003). Parametrized Functional Features and SLA, In Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2002), ed. Liceras, J. M. et al., 97-105, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. At www.lingref.com, document #1033.
Hawkins, R. (2005). Revisiting Wh-movement: The Availability of an Uninterpretable [wh] Feature in Interlanguage Grammars, InProceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2004), ed. Dekydtspotter, L. et al., 124-137, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. At www.lingref.com, document #1161.
Hornstein, N. (1996). Logical Form: From GB to Minimalism, Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
Lardiere, D. (2000). Mapping Features to Forms in Second Language Acquisition, ed. Archibald, J. In Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, Massachusetts: Blackwell, pp. 102-129.
Lardiere, D. (2005). On Morphological Competence, In Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2004), ed. Dekydtspotter, L. et al., 178-192, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. At www.lingref.com, document #1165.
Radford, A. (2006). Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Renaud, C. (2008). Verbal Agreement in Second Language Acquisition: The Case of Object Pronouns in French, In Proceedings of the 9th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2007), ed. Slabakova, R. et al., 196-205, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. At www.lingref.com, document #1638.
VanPatten, B. and Benati, A. G. (2015). Key Terms in Second Language Acquisition,  London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 03 February 2017
  • Revise Date: 22 June 2017
  • Accept Date: 11 July 2017

Share

How to cite

Statistics