پویش و اولویت‌بندی عوامل فناورانه، فرهنگی - اجتماعی، اقتصادی و سیاستگذارانه مؤثر بر آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی‌زبانان در افق 1414

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه آینده‌پژوهی، دانشگاه بین‌المللی امام خمینی (ره)، قزوین، ایران.

2 نویسندۀ مسئول، دانشجوی دکتری آینده‌پژوهی، دانشگاه بین المللی امام خمینی (ره)، قزوین، ایران.

10.30479/jtpsol.2024.19710.1654

چکیده

امروزه، عوامل و روندهای کلان فناورانه، فرهنگی – اجتماعی، اقتصادی و سیاسی به شدت دانشگاه‌ها، مدارس و مراکز آموزشی را تحت تأثیر قرار داده‌اند و موفقیت برنامه‌های آموزشی در عرصه‌های مختلف، مستلزم شناسایی و ملحوظ داشتن این عوامل است. از این رو، پژوهش حاضر با هدف پویش و اولویت‌بندی عوامل فناورانه، فرهنگی – اجتماعی، اقتصادی و سیاسی مؤثر بر آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی‌زبانان انجام گردیده است. نوع پژوهش کاربردی با رویکرد اکتشافی است و جامعه آماری آن 27 نفر از خبرگان و اساتید مراکز آموزش زبان فارسی در دانشگاه‌های معتبر مستقر در شهر تهران شامل مرکز بین‌المللی آزفا دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، مرکز بین‌المللی آموزش زبان فارسی تربیت مدرس، مرکز آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی‌زبانان دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، مرکز بین‌المللی آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی‌زبانان دانشگاه الزهرا (س) و مرکز بین‌المللی آموزش زبان فارسی دانشگاه تهران هستند. در گام نخست پژوهش با انجام مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای و بررسی‌های پژوهشی 66 عامل شناسایی و احصاء شد. سپس با اجرای روش آینده‌پژوهانه دلفی پس از سه راند توافق بین خبرگان حاصل گردید و عواملی که ضریب توافقی «کندال» بالای 7/0 را کسب نمودند بر حسب میانگین امتیازات حاصل شده در راند سوم (میانگین بیشتر در رتبه بالاتر) رتبه‌بندی شدند. در دسته عوامل فناورانه هشت عامل، در دسته عوامل فرهنگی – اجتماعی دوازده عامل، در دسته عوامل اقتصادی نُه عامل و در دسته عوامل سیاسی شش عامل مؤثر تشخیص داده شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Scanning and prioritization of technological, cultural-social, economic and policy-making factors effective on teaching Persian language to non-Persian speakers in the horizon of 2035

نویسندگان [English]

  • Moslem Shirvani Naghani 1
  • Khalil Koulivand 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Futures Studies, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.
2 Ph.D Student of Futures Studies, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Today, macro-technological, cultural-social, economic and political factors and trends have strongly affected universities, schools and educational centers, and the success of educational programs in various fields requires identifying and taking into account these factors. Therefore, the current research was conducted with the aim of scanning and prioritizing the technological, cultural-social, economic and political factors affecting the teaching of Persian language to non-Persian speakers. The type of research is applied with an exploratory approach, and its statistical population is 27 experts and professors of Persian language teaching centers in prestigious universities located in Tehran, including Azfa International Center of Shahid Beheshti University, Tarbiat Modares International Persian Language Teaching Center, and Persian Teaching Center for Non-Persian Speakers. Allameh Tabatabai University, the International Center for Teaching Farsi to Non-Persian Speakers of Al-Zahra University and the International Center for Teaching Persian Language of Tehran University. In the first step of the research, 66 factors were identified and counted by conducting library studies and research studies. Then, by implementing the futuristic Delphi method, after three rounds, an agreement was reached between the experts, and the factors that obtained the "Kendall" consensus coefficient above 0.7 were ranked according to the average points obtained in the third round (higher average in the higher rank). In the category of technological factors, eight factors, in the category of social-cultural factors, twelve factors, in the category of economic factors, nine factors, and in the category of political factors, six factors were identified as effective. The most effective factor of technology and language education, the use of multimedia in the educational environment, the most effective factor of culture and society and language education, the demographic changes of students, non-governmental education, the increase in foreign currency income of the government and the commercialization of education activities for non-Persian speakers, the three most effective factors of economy and language education and the most effective factor of policy making and According to the experts in the field of language teaching, the factors affecting the teaching of Persian language to non-Persian speakers were recognized as knowledge transfer policies between nations.
Extended Abstract:
Introduction
Teaching the Persian language to non-Persian speakers, in addition to being considered as a potential solution for the expansion of the Persian language, has various dimensions such as preserving, strengthening, developing and expanding the sphere of influence of Iranian culture. In addition, in this way, it is possible to provide positive grounds for cultural interaction with other nations that send students to Iran for various academic courses and to provide grounds for a wider presence in the industrial and commercial arenas among other nations. Therefore, the current research aims to identify and prioritize the technological, social, economic and political factors affecting the teaching of the Persian language to non-Persian speakers in the horizon of 2035, and seeks to answer the main question that the most important technological, social, economic and political factors affecting the teaching of Persian language Who are the Non-Persian speakers on the horizon of 2035?
Methodology
The current research is of an applied type with an exploratory approach, with the aim of surveying and prioritizing the technological, social, economic and political factors affecting the teaching of Persian language to non-Persian speakers through the examination of library resources including books, articles and internet sites, four environmental factors and trends have identified Since the factors involved in this research are diverse, a quantitative approach to the research may cause some factors to be ignored, so a qualitative approach was taken into consideration to investigate the factors and the factors were surveyed and investigated through the Delphi method. Experts considered for the research include professors of Persian language teaching centers in prestigious universities located in Tehran, including AZFA International Center of Shahid Beheshti University, International Center of Persian Language Education of Tarbiat Modares University, Center of Farsi Language Education for Non-Persian Speakers of Allameh Tabatabaei University, International Center of Persian Language Education for Non-Persian Speakers Al-Zahra University and the International Persian Language Education Center of Tehran University were the maximum number of collected questionnaires that experts answered were 27. Then, with the help of descriptive statistics and Kendall's coefficient, the collected data were analyzed. The projects and studies that have been reviewed for the current research have all been carried out in the last 8 years and extensive and reliable sources have been used for the study. The observational focus has been on the four trends affecting the teaching of the Persian language to non-Persian speakers until the year 2035.
Results and Discussion
The method of data interpretation is done with the help of the Delphi method and based on the collective intelligence of experts and based on the collective opinion of experts on a special problem, which can be used to achieve the best possible option. The Delphi method is the implementation of a questionnaire with successive rounds with feedback that is controlled to reach a consensus among a group of experts and specialists about a specific issue. In this research, Kendall's consensus coefficient was used as a criterion for accepting experts' opinions in Delphi rounds, and Delphi rounds were held until the percentage of experts' agreement and coordination in 50% of the factors reached over 70%. Then, using the average criterion obtained for each factor, the factors were ranked and the validity of the content is the opinions of the experts, which were received and applied with closed and open questions in three Delphi stages. In addition, construct validity was done by testing the questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha test was used regarding the reliability of the measured instrument. In the first step of the research, 66 factors were identified and counted by conducting library studies and research studies. Then, by implementing the futuristic Delphi method, after three rounds, an agreement was reached between the experts, and the factors that obtained the "Kendall" consensus coefficient above 0.7 were ranked according to the average points obtained in the third round (higher average in the higher rank).
Conclusion
In the category of technological factors, eight factors of web-based education, increasing mocks, the use of multimedia in the educational environment, Persian language educational software, data mining software, adaptive learning, change in evaluation tools and the flipped classroom were identified as effective factors, among which the use Multimedia in the educational environment was chosen as the priority, and the next ranks were assigned to web-based education and data mining software.
In the category of social-cultural factors, twelve factors of the civilizational and social history of countries, lack of Persian language educational films, audio and video conferences, the alphabetic and literary structure of the second language, the cultural and moral image of Iranians in Persian language education books, international cultural and ethnic differences, change Students' demographics, non-Persian speakers' sense of the West, Non-Persian speakers personalized learning, students' level of learning, ancient monuments and cultural heritage of nations, and increased mobility and movement of students around the world were identified as effective factors, among which the students' demographic changes are the highest has been given priority.
In the category of economic factors, nine factors are the production and sale of simulators and high-level intellectual software, non-governmental education, economic policies of resistance effective on education, increasing government foreign exchange earnings, sources of income from educational tools and equipment, reducing government entrepreneurship, commercialization of education activities. For Non-Persian speakers, educational infrastructure costs and attention to other sources of income were chosen as effective factors by experts. The three factors of non-governmental education, increasing foreign currency income of the government and commercialization of education activities for non-Persian speakers were given priority.
In the category of political factors, among the sixteen factors, experts identified six factors as the lack of complete coordination between scientific groups in the compilation of educational documents, international partnerships, transfer of the official values of the system, securing the interests and goals of the stakeholders, the policies of knowledge transfer between nations and the increase of educational poles. They identified the effective factors. Among these, the policies of knowledge transfer between nations were given the highest rank.
Conflict of Interest
There was no conflict of interest in this research.
 Acknowledgment
Appreciation goes to all the people who helped us in doing this research, in particular Dr. Jalal Rahimian, who is a professor of linguistics in the Department of Foreign Languages and Linguistics at Shiraz University.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Technology and language education
  • Culture and society and language education
  • Economy and language education
  • Politics and language education
  • Persian language education
  • Non-Persian speakers
احمدی جعفری، منصوره. (1399). مبانی نظری مهارت‌های آموزش زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی زبانان، دوفصلنامه مطالعات آموزش زبان فارسی، 10(2)، 59-76.
استادزاده، زهرا. (1399). بررسی میزان علاقمندی‌های زبان‌آموزان غیرفارسی زبان به متون منثور زبان فارسی (مقاله علمی پژوهشی). پژوهش نامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی زبانان، 9(2)، 235-259.
اسکندری مهنوش، سعیدی علی. (1402)، بررسی و مقایسه واژه‌بست در زبان‌های روسی و فارسی. فصلنامه جستارهای زبانی. ۱۴(۶)، ۲۷۷-۳۰۴.
بابایی ولنی، الهام. (1401). اهمیت آموزش و ارزشیابی واژگان در یادگیری زبان دوم/خارجی. دوفصلنامه مطالعات آموزش زبان فارسی، 7(12)، 89-104.
پایتختی اسکوئی، سید علی. و طبقچی اکبری، لاله. (1395). جهانی شدن و مخارج آموزشی: شواهدی از ایران و کشورهای منتخب در حال توسعه. مطالعات برنامه ریزی آموزشی، 5(10)، 75-89.
تاج‏الدین، سیّدضیاء‏الدین. و نعمتی سرخی، محبوبه. (1391). بررسی تأثیر آموزش از طریق رایانه در مقایسه با روش سنتی بر میزان یادگیری زبان آموزان غیرفارسی زبان. پژوهش‌نامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی زبانان، 1(1)، 101-122.
جمال الدین، فرانک. کامیابی گل، عطیه. تفضلی، دارا. (1401). تحلیل نظام‏ مند پژوهش‌های آموزش و یادگیری زبان به کمک فناوری در ایران. پژوهش‌نامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی زبانان، 11(2)، 3-38.
خدادادیان، مهدی. و ابطحی، سید مهدی. (1395). هوش فرهنگی و یادگیری مهارت‏های زبان فارسی در فارسی ‏آموزان غیرایرانی. پژوهش‌نامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی زبانان، 5(2)، 123-142.
دهشیری، محمدرضا. و طاهری، مهدی. (1395). نقش و جایگاه آموزش عالی در دیپلماسی فرهنگی ایالات ‌متحده آمریکا: با تأکید بر عملکرد آن در قبال ایران. فصلنامه تخصصی علوم سیاسی، 12(36)، 61-98.
رضایی، محمدحسن. مروت، احمدعلی. و رمضان‌پور، علیرضا. (1398)، نقش برخی عوامل فردی و خانوادگی در انتخاب دانشگاه محل تحصیل، روانشناسی و علوم رفتاری ایران. 17(2)، 33-44.
رفیعی سخایی، سپیده. بیوک، بهنام. و سیفوری، زهره. (1402). بررسی تطبیقی تأثیر روش‌های یادگیری آشکار، ضمنی و اکتشافی بر درک افعال مجهول بین زبان‌آموزان زبان انگلیسی. پژوهش‌های نوین در مطالعات زبان انگلیسی، 11(1)، 27-1.
سعیدی، زری. و سجادی، شهره‌ سادات. (1393). عوامل تأثیرگذار بر به‌کارگیری رایانه و فناوری در‏ آموزش زبان فارسی به غیر‌فارسی‌زبانان. پژوهش نامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی زبانان، 3(3)، 143-170.
سلیمی، برات. نامور، یوسف. راستگو، اعظم. و سلیمانی، توران. (1401). بررسی نظام‌مند اثرات فن‌آوری‌های نوین بر روندهای آموزشی آینده. فناوری آموزش، 16(3)، 647-659.
سند چشم انداز بیست ساله جمهوری اسلامی ایران، (1382)، ابلاغی دفتر مقام معظم رهبریمدظله العالی، طی نامه 5775/1- مورخه 13/08/1382 به دفتر ریاست جمهوری اسلامی ایران.
عرب نژاد، زینب. (1399). نقش انگیزشی محتوا در گسترش و بهبود آموزش زبان فارسی و راهکارهای آن. مطالعات آموزش زبان فارسی، 4(6)، 111-123.
عزتی، میترا. میرکمالی، سید محمد. و صادقی، لیلا. (1395). ارائه الگوی بهینه مدیریت دانش در دانشگاه منطبق با سند چشم انداز جمهوری اسلامی ایران در افق 1404. سیاست‌های راهبردی و کلان، 4(13)، 1-24.
فتحی هفشجانی، فرشیده. زینعلی‌پور، حسین. شیخی فینی، علی اکبر. فتحی واجارگاه، کوروش. و جعفری، اسماعیل. (1401)، کارکردهای فناورانه آموزشی موک‌ها برای کارکنان در محیط کار، نشریه علمی فناوری آموزش، 2(17)، 303-316.
فرجی، سید اسماعیل. (1399). بررسی جایگاه مطالعات میان رشته ای در آموزش زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی زبانان. مطالعات آموزش زبان فارسی، 6(10)، 77-90.
گل پور، لیلا. عقبی، زهرا. و نوریانی، ندا. (1401). راهکارهای آموزش الفبای زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی‌زبانان از دیدگاه مدرسان. مطالعات آموزش زبان فارسی، 7(12)، 125-142.
مرادی، مرضیه. اروجی، محمدرضا. و جعفری، سکینه. (1399). تأثیر محیط ترکیبی آموزش زبان در یادگیری دستور زبان و لغات در فارسی‌آموزان غیرایرانی سطح متوسط. پژوهش‌نامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی زبانان، 9(2)، 287-305.
نیکویه، مهدی. شیروانی ناغانی، مسلم. درویشی سه تلانی، فرهاد. و بیات، روح الله. (1399). شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی عوامل چندزمینه‌ای مؤثر بر روند فرار مغزها (تحلیل و پیش‌نگری موج چهارم این پدیده در ایران: از 1390 تا افق 1404). مجلس و راهبرد، 27(104)، 127-154.
References:
Ahmadi Jafari, M. (2019). Theoretical foundations of Persian language teaching skills to non-Persian speakers, bi-quarterly journal of Persian language teaching studies, 10(2), Pp. 59-76, [In Persian].
Arabnejadz, Z. (2020). The motivational role of content in expanding and improving Persian language teaching and its solutions. Persian language teaching studies, 4(6), 111-123, [In Persian].
Babaei Velni, E. (2021). The importance of teaching and evaluating vocabulary in second/foreign language learning. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Persian Language Education Studies, 7(12), Pp. 89-104, [In Persian].
Ball, S. J. (2020). Following policy: Networks, network ethnography and education policy mobilities. In Globalisation and education, Pp 126-143.
Castro, R. (2019). Blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities. Education and Information Technologies, 24(4), Pp 223-246.‏
Damewood, A. M. (2016). Current trends in higher education technology: Simulation. Tech Trends, 60, 268-271.‏
Dehshiri, M. R., & Taheri, M. (2016). The Role of Higher Educatio in US Cultural Diplomacy: Emphasis on Performance in Iran. Political Science Quarterly, 12(36), Pp 61-98, [In Persian].
Eskandari M, Saeidi A. (2024) Review and comparison of clitic in Russian and Persian languages. LRR, 14 (6), 277-304, [In Persian].
Ezzati, M., Mirkamali, S. M., & Sadeqi, L. (2016). The Optimal Model of Knowledge Management at the University in Accordance with the Vision of the Islamic Republic of Iran in 2025. Quarterly Journal of The Macro and Strategic Policies, 4(13), 1-24, [In Persian].
 Fathi Hafeshjani, F. Zain Alipour, H. Sheikhi Fini, A.A. Fathi Vajargah, K. & Jafari, I. (2023), Educational technological functions of Mocks for employees in the workplace, Scientific Journal of Education Technology, 2(17), 303-316, [In Persian].
Faraji, S. E. (2020). Investigating the position of interdisciplinary studies in teaching Persian to non-Persian speakers. Persian language teaching studies, 6(10), Pp 77-90, [In Persian].
Gardea, J. (2020). Latino English language learners: Perceived cultural, social, and educational factors that influence academic achievement (Doctoral dissertation, Lamar University-Beaumont).‏
Golpour, L. Back, Z. and Nouriani, N. (2022). The strategies of teaching the Persian alphabet to non-Persian speakers from the teachers' point of view. Persian Language Education Studies, 7(12), 125-142, [In Persian].
Huang, W., Hew, K. F., & Fryer, L. K. (2022). Chatbots for language learning—Are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot‐supported language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), Pp 237-257.‏
Jamaleddin, F., Kamyabigol, A., & Tafazoli, D. (2022). Systematic Analysis of Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) Research in Iran. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 11(2), Pp 3-38, [In Persian].
Kannan, M., Bojan, N., Swaminathan, J., Zicarelli, G., Hemalatha, D., Zhang, Y.,  Faggio, C. (2023). Nanopesticides in agricultural pest management and their environmental risks: A review. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 1-26.‏
Khodadadiyan, M., & Mehdi Abtahi, S. (2016). Cultural Intelligence and Learning Linguistic Abilities in Non- Iranian Persian Language Learners. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 5(TOME 12), 123-142, [In Persian].
Matei, M. C., & Abrudan, M. M. (2016). Adapting Herzberg's two factor theory to the cultural context of Romania. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 221, 95-104.‏
Moradi, M., Oroji, M. R., & Jafari, S. (2020). The Effect of a Blended Language Environment on the Grammar Achievement and Vocabulary Learning of Intermediate PFL Learners. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 9(20), Pp 287-305, [In Persian].
Nikuyeh, M., shirvani naghani, M., darvishi, F., & bayat, R. (2020). Identifying and prioritizing the multi-dimensional factors affecting the process of brain drain (analyzing and predicting the fourth wave of this phenomenon in Iran: from 2011 to 2025). Majlis and Rahbord, 27(104), 127-154, [In Persian].
Ostadzadeh, Z. (2020). The Study of Using Prose Texts in Persian Textbooks for Non-Persian Speakers and Their Interests to These Texts. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 9(20), 235-259, [In Persian].
Paytakhti Ouskouei, A. and Tabaghchi Akbari, L. (2016). Globalization and Education Expenditures: Evidence from Iran and Selected Developing Countries. Journal of Educational Planning Studies, 5(10), 75-89, [In Persian].
Rafiei sakhaei, S., behnam, B., & Seifoori, Z. (2023). A Comparative Study of the Effect of Explicit, Implicit, and Discovery Learning Methods on EFL Learners’ Comprehension of English Passive Voice. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 11(1), 1-27, [In Persian].
Rezaei, M.H. Marwat, A.A. and Ramzanpour, A. (2018), the role of some individual and family factors in choosing a university to study psychology and behavioral sciences in Iran. 17(2), 33-44, [In Persian].
Saeidi, Z., & Sadat Sajjadi, S. (2014). Effective Factors in Applying Computers and Technology in Teaching Persian Language to Non-Iranian Learners. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 3(VOL.3,NO.3,(TOME 8)), 143-170, [In Persian].
Salimi, B., Namvar, Y., Rastgoo, A., & Soleimani, T. (2022). A Systematic Study of the effects of new technologies on future educational trends. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 16(3), Pp 647-659, [In Persian].
Tajeddin, S. Z., & Nemati Sorkhi, M. (2012). A Survey on the Effect of Computer-assisted Language Teaching, in Contrast to the Traditional Method, on Non-native Persian Learners’ Performance. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages1(1), 101-122, [In Persian].
The twenty-year vision document of the Islamic Republic of Iran, (2013), communicated by the office of the Supreme Leader, through letter 1/5775 dated 13/08/2013 to the office of the President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, [In Persian].
Wajid, M. A., & Zafar, A. (2021). Pestel analysis to identify key barriers to smart cities development in India. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 42, Pp 39-48.‏
Wojciuk, A., Michałek, M., & Stormowska, M. (2015). Education as a source and tool of soft power in international relations. European Political Science, 14, 298-317.‏
Wiers-Jenssen, J. (2019). Paradoxical attraction? Why an increasing number of international students choose Norway. Journal of Studies in international Education, 23(2), 281-298.‏
Zhang, T., Lu, X., Zhu, X., & Zhang, J. (2023). The contributions of AI in the development of ideological and political perspectives in education. Heliyon, 9(3), 245-261.