هوش فرهنگی مدرسان آموزش زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی زبانان و متغیرهای پیش بینی کننده ی آن

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

نویسنده ی مسئول، دانشجوی دکتری آموزش زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی زبانان، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی

10.30479/jtpsol.2020.13281.1484

چکیده

هوش فرهنگی مدرسان زبان فارسی به ­غیرفارسی‌زبانان عاملی مهم در ارتقاء کیفیت تدریس آنان به‌شمارمی‌رود. اگرچه تحقیقات فراوانی در حوزه­ی هوش فرهنگی معلمان در مدارس ایرانی انجام شده‌است؛ ولی پیشینه­ی پژوهش درباره هوش فرهنگی مدرسان آموزش زبان فارسی به فارسی­آموزان خارجی بسیار اندک است. هدف اصلی پژوهشگر پرکردن این خلاء قابل­ملاحظه بوده‌است. بدین منظور پژوهش حاضر با شیوه‌ای توصیفی- همبستگی و با تمرکز بر دو هدف، یعنی سنجش هوش فرهنگی مدرسان آموزش زبان فارسی به­ غیرفارسی­زبانان و شناسایی متغیرهای پیش‌بینی­کننده­ی آن انجام­ گرفته‌است. 30 مدرس آموزش زبان فارسی مرکز آموزش زبان فارسی به­ غیرفارسی­زبانان دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد به سؤالات پرسشنامه­ی آنگ و همکاران (Ang et al., 2007) و همچنین پرسشنامه­ی متغیرهای پیش‌بینی­کننده­ی ­هوش فرهنگی بر اساس پژوهش پتروویچ (Petrović, 2011) پاسخ­دادند. از نرم­افزار اس‌پی‌اس‌اس برای انجام آمار استنباطی (آزمون همبستگی پیرسون و رگراسیون چندمتغیری) و شاخص­های آمار توصیفی در سنجش هوش فرهنگی و متغیرهای پیش­بینی­کننده­ی مدرسان زبان فارسی استفاده­گردید. یافته‌های حاصل از این پژوهش نشان­داد که مدرسان آموزش زبان فارسی از هوش فرهنگی بالایی برخوردارند (نمره­ی میانگین بالاتر از 3).  بیشترین نمره به مؤلفه­ی انگیزشی (4.31) و کم­ترین نمره به مؤلفه­ی شناختی (3.67) هوش فرهنگی اختصاص­دارد. از بین متغیرهای پیش‌بینی‌کننده، پذیرا­ بودن برای یادگیری بین­فرهنگی مهم­ترین متغیر در پیش‌بینی هوش ­فرهنگی بوده­است (ارزش t =3.240). بعد از آن به­ترتیب اهمیت شناخت سایر فرهنگ­ها، تماس با مردم سایر فرهنگ­ها و برقراری ارتباط به­ زبان خارجی قرار گرفته­است. خواندن ادبیات­ خارجی (ادبیات سایر کشورها) کم اهمیت­ترین متغیر در پیش­بینی هوش­فرهنگی بوده‌است (ارزش t=0.080). 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Cultural Intelligence of Persian Language Teachers to Non-Persian Speakers and Its Predicting Variables

نویسنده [English]

  • Faranak Eslami
Corresponding author, PhD candidate in teaching Persian to Non- Persian speakers, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Cultural Intelligence of Persian language teachers to non-Persian speakers is considered a very important factor in improving their teaching quality. Although plenty of studies have been conducted in the field of teachers’ cultural intelligence in Iranian schools, there is very little research on cultural intelligence of Persian teachers to non-Persian speakers. To fill this remarkable gap, the present study adopted a descriptive-correlational approach aimed to determine Persian language teachers’cultural intelligence level and investigate its predicting variables. The research sample included 30 Persian language teachers of Ferdowsi University Persian language teaching center in Mashhad who answered both Ang et al. (2007) cultural intelligence questionnaire and the predicting variables of cultural intelligence questionnaire based on Petrović (2011). The collected data were analyzed by SPSS for both inferential statistics (Pearson correlation Test and multivariable Regression) and descriptive indices too. The research findings showed Persian language teachers’ high level of cultural intelligence (higher than mean score 3). The highest score was reported for the motivational component (4.31) and the lowest one for the cognitive component (3.67). Regarding predicting variables, openness for intercultural learning is the most important variable ( t value=3.240). Other variables including importance of knowing other cultures, contact with people of other cultures and communication in foreign language were in the next ranks respectively. Reading of foreign literature (literature of other countries) was the least important variable (t value=0.080).
Extended Abstract:
Cultural intelligence is a special form of intelligence that emphasizes a persons’ ability to understand, reason and function effectively in the culturally diverse situations. At the most general level, cultural intelligence is defined as the ability to adapt to new cultural contexts (Earley, 2002; Earley & Ang, 2003). Due to the expansion of Persian language and growing number of foreign students interested in learning it, Persian language teachers to non-Persian speakers need to develope cultural capabilities and competencies measured by cultural intelligence to create calm and peaceful atmosphere for language learners from different cultures in the same class. In this regard, cultural intelligence helps Persian language teachers to be sensitive across the cultures and communicate with learners of various cultures in the multicultural educational environments appropriately and therefore teach more effectively. According to Earley and Ang (2003) cultural intelligence consists of four components: metacognitive, cognitive, motivational and behavioral component. The metacognitive aspect of cultural intelligence reflects mental processes that individuals use to acquire and understand cultural knowledge .The cognitive aspect of cultural intelligence reflects knowledge of the norms, practices and conventions in different cultures acquired from education and personal experience. The motivational aspect of cultural intelligence reflects the capability to direct attention and energy toward learning about and functioning in situations characterised by cultural differences. The behavioural aspect of cultural intelligence reflects the capability to exhibit appropriate verbal and nonverbal actions when interacting with people from different cultures. The instrumentation for measuring cultural intelligence and its components is the questionnaire of 20 items designed by Ang et al. (2007). Although some studies have been conducted in the field of cultural intelligence of non-Persian language learners, few addressed the Persian language teachers’ cultural intelligence. The guiding study was that of Petrović (2011) in Serbia which determined the cultural intelligence level of 107 elementary school teachers in 4 cities of Serbia and examined 8 predicting variables to recognize the most effective ones as the predictors of cultural intelligence. The study confirmed the high level of teachers’cultural intelligence. The most and the least important variables were enjoyment of intercultural communicationsand the importance of knowing other cultures respectively. Then, the present research was aimed to measure cultural intelligence of Persian language teachers to non-Persian speakers and investigate its predicting variables. 30 Persian language teachers from Ferdowsi University Persian language teaching center in Mashhad, by teaching background span from one to over ten years, were asked to answer two questionnaires translated into Persian and modified based on the present teaching context. The first one was adapted from Ang et al. (2007) cultural intelligence questionnaire including 20 items designed on a five Likert scales from completely disagree to completely agree and measured four cultural intelligence components: metacognitive (items 1-4), cognitive (items 5-10), motivational (items 11-15) and behavioral component (items 16-20). Teachers were exposed to Petrović (2011) predicting variables questionnaire of 3 Likert scales, from low to high, too. Predicting variables questionnaire contains 8 predicting variables as follows: contact with the people from other cultures, communication in foreign language, reading of foreign literature, watching TV travel shows, importance of knowing other cultures, considering multicultural composition of the class as challenge, openness for intercultural learning and enjoyment of intercultural communications. For analyzing the data, SPSS provided both inferential statistics (Pearson correlation Test and Multivariable Regression) and descriptive statistics on components of cultural intelligence and its predicting variables for Persian language teachers to non-Persian speakers. The results demonstrated that the mean scores underpinning teachers’ cultural intelligence components were above 3. The highest and the lowest score were reported for the motivational component (M=4.31) and the cognitive component (M=3.67) respectively. Pearson correlation Test results indicated that the relationship between cultural intelligence components and the predicting variables was statistically significant. The effect of these variables on the cultural intelligence was studied by conducting multivariable Regression. As a result, the most important variable was openness for intercultural learning. Other variables such as importance of knowing other cultures, contact with people of other cultures and communication in foreign language were in the next ranks respectively. However, reading foreign literature has obtained the least importance. The results of data collected in this study suggested Persian languag teachers’ high level of the cultural intelligence. The two variables including contact with people of other cultures and openness for intercultural learningwere placed among the important variables, as the same reported by Petrović (2011), while no evidence of conformity was found for the most important variable for predicting cultural intelligence in the present study, that is, openness for intercultural learning, The latter point may allude to the fact that Persian language teachers are aware that in addition to sufficient knowledge about language skills, cultural capabilities especially more cultural familiarity with various cultures are required to teach effectively, deal with the learners of different cultures and answer their needs and questions appropriately. To conclude, it is necessary to draw the teachers’ attention to improve their teaching pedagogy and cultural capabilities. This can be accomplished if teachers are encouraged to intercultural learning and using multicultural classes as their learning resources in teacher training courses (TTC) targeted at teaching Persian language to non-Persian speakers.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Cultural Intelligence
  • Persian language teachers to non-Persian speakers
  • predicting variables of cultural intelligence
احمدی، سید علی­اکبر، صفرزاده، حسین، حضوری، محمدجواد و دهنوی، فریبا. (1392). نقش هوش فرهنگی مدیران در توان حل تعارض کارکنان. دوفصلنامه‌ی علمی- پژوهشی شناخت اجتماعی 2 (1). صص:101-116 .
حسین زاده، شیما و صفری، محمود. ( 1393). رابطه‌‌ی هوش فرهنگی و توانمندسازی معلمان؛ مطالعه موردی، فصلنامه‌ی مطالعات منابع انسانی،  3(13)، صص: 146-115.
حمیدی، فریده، دماوندی، محمدابراهیم و دهنوی، الهام. ( 1391). رابطه‌ی هوش فرهنگی و سواد کامپیوتری معلمان با سبک مدیریتی کلاسی آنان، فصلنامه‌ی فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات در علوم تربیتی، 3(1) ، صص: 26-5 .
خدادادیان، مهدی و ابطحی، سید مهدی. (1395). هوش فرهنگی و یادگیری مهارت­های زبان فارسی در فارسی­آموزان غیرایرانی. پژوهش­نامه‌ی آموزش زبان فارسی به ­غیرفارسی­زبانان، 5(2)، صص:142-125.
عباسیان، فهیمه. (1392). بررسی رابطه‌ی هوش فرهنگی و توانش ارتباطی در غیر فارسی­زبانان؛ مطالعه‌ی موردی فارسی‌آموزان خارجی (پایان­نامه کارشناسی ارشد).  دانشگاه فردوسی، مشهد، ایران.
فیاضی، مرجان و جان نثار احمدی، هدی. (1385). هوش فرهنگی؛ نیاز مدیران در قرن تنوع، ماهنامه تدبیر، 17(172).
ملک پور، فاطمه و مرادی برزیان، معصومه. (1394). بررسی رابطه‌ی بین هوش فرهنگی و توانمند­سازی معلمان مدارس دولتی استان خوزستان، نخستین همایش بین المللی مدیریت آموزشی ایران.
 نوروزی فرد، هرمز و بختیاری ، اکرم. (1394). نقش هوش فرهنگی بر فرآیند حل مسأله در بین دبیران متوسطه‌ی دوره‌ی دوم شهر کرمانشاه سال تحصیلی 93-94، کنفرانس بین المللی مدیریت، اقتصاد و مهندسی صنایع، تهران: مؤسسه مدیران ایده­پرداز پایتخت ویرا.
هادی‌زاده مقدم، اکرم و حسینی، ابوالحسن. (1386). بررسی رابطه‌ی بین هوش فرهنگی و اثربخشی گروهی، مرکز نوسازی و تحول اداری، تهران، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.
یارمحمدزاده، پیمان و داداش­زاده، مجید. ( 1394). بررسی نقش هوش فرهنگی و سرمایه‌ی اجتماعی در سازگاری شغلی معلمان: آزمون نقش میانجی سرمایه اجتماعی، رویکردهای نوین آموزشی دانشکده‌ی علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی دانشگاه اصفهان ، (1)10، شماره‌ی پیاپی 21، 66-41.
 
    References:
Abbasian, F. (2013). The study of Relation between Cultural Intelligence and Communication Competence in Non-Persians: Case Study in Non-Persian Students. (Masters Thesis). Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran. [In Persian]
Ahmadi, S. A. A., Safarzadeh, H., Hoozoori, M. J.,  & Dehnavi, F. (2013). The Role of Cultural Intelligence of Managers on employees’ conflict resolution ability, Journal of Social Cognition, 2(3), 101-116. [In Persian]
 Ang, S. & Van Dyne, L. (2008). Handbook of Cultural Intelligence: Theory, Measurement, and Applications. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.                                                                                    
Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Koh, C., Ng, K. Y., Templar, K. J., & Tay, C. (2007). Cultural Intelligence: Its Measurement and Effects on Cultural Judgment and Decision Making, Cultural Adaptation and Task Performance. Management and Organization Review, 3: 335-71.
Brislin, R. Worthley, R. & Macnab, B. (2006). Cultural Intelligence: Understanding behaviors that serve people s goals. Group & Organization Management, 31(1):40-55.     
Crowne, K. A. (2008). What leads to cultural intelligence? Business Horizons, 51, 391-399.                           
 Earley, P. C. & Peterson, R. S. (2004). The Elusive Cultural Chameleon: Cultural Intelligence as a New Approach to Intercultural Training for the Global Manager. Academy of Management learning and Education, 3(1), 100–115.                                                                                                        
Earley, P. C. (2002). Redefining Interactions across Cultures and Organizations: Moving Forward with Cultural Intelligence. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 271-99.                                                                          
Earley, P. C., & Ang, S. (2003). Cultural intelligence: Individual interactions across cultures. PaloAlto: Stanford University Press.
Earley, P. C., & Mosakowski, E. (2004). Cultural intelligence. Harvard BusinessReview, 82(10), 139-146
Fayyazi, M. & JanNesar Ahmadi, H. (2006). Cultural Intelligence, the Managers’ need in Diversity Century. Journal of  Scheme, 17(172). [In Persian]
Goh, M. (2012). Teaching with Cultural Intelligence: developing multiculturally educated and globally engaged citizens. Asia Pacific journal of Education, 32(4). 395 -415. 
Hadizadeh Moghaddam, A. & Hosseini, A. (2007). The Study of Relationship Between Cultural Intelligence and Team Effectiveness,The Renovation Center and Administrative Evolution. Tehran, Accounting and Management college of Shahid Beheshti. [In Persian]                                         
Hallmon, L. Y. (2015). Exploring the Relationship between Cultural Intelligence and teacher burnout in the Mississippi. Delta Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA. A dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree doctor of education.
Hamidi, F., Damavandi, M. E. & Dehnavi, E. (2012). Relationship between Cultural Intelligence and Computer Literacy with Teachers’ classroom Management Style. Journal of Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 3(1),5-26. [In Persian]
Hossein Zadeh, Sh.& Safari, M. (2014). The Relation between Cultural Intelligence and Powering of Teachers. Journal of study of Human resources, 3(13), 115-146. [In Persian]
Kihlstorm, J. F, & Cantor, N. (2000).Social Intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (ED.), Handbook of Intelligence (2nded, pp359-379).Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Khodadadian, M. & Abtahi, S. M. (2016). Cultural Intelligence and Persian Language Skills Learning in Non- Native Students. Journal of Teaching Persian Language to Non-Persian Speakers, 5(2), 125-142. [in Persian]
Livermore, D. (2011). The Cultural Intelligence Difference: Master the One Skill You Can’t Do Without in Today’s Global Economy. AMACOM.
Malekpoor, F. & Moradi Barzian, M. (2015). The Study of the Relation between Cultural Intelligence and Powering the Public Schools Teachers in Khuzestan Province. The First international meeting of Iran Educational management. [In Persian]
Molina, S.Ch. (2013). Romanticizing Culture: The Role of Teachers’ cultural Intelligence in Working with Diversity. The CATESOL Journal, 24(1).
Ng, K.-Y., Van Dyne, L., & Ang, S. (2012). Cultural intelligence: A review, reflections, and recommendations for future research. In A. M. Ryan, F. T. L. Leong, & F. L. Oswald (Eds.), Conducting multinational research: Applying organizational psychology in the workplace (p. 29–58). American Psychological Association.
Nowruzi Fard, H. & Bakhtiari, A. (2015). The Role of Cultural Intelligence on the Problem Solving process among High School Teachers of grade two in  93-94 school year, The International conference of management, Economy and industrial Engineering. Tehran, The institution of Vira Capital creative managers. [In Persian]
Peterson, B. (2004). Cultural Intelligence: A guide to working with people from other cultures.Yarmouth, Me: Intercultural Press.
 Petrović, D.S. (2011). How do teachers perceive their cultural intelligence? Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 11, 276-280.
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). The Concept of Intelligence and its role in lifelong learning. American Psychologist, 52:1030-1037.
Thomas, DC. (2006). Domain and Development of Cultural Intelligence: The importance of mindfulness. Group & organization Management, 31:154-173.
Wang, J., Lin, E., Spalding, E., Odell, S.J., & Klecka, C.L. (2011). Understanding teacher education in an era of globalization. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2).
Yarmohammadzadeh, P. & Dadashzadeh, M. (2015). Study the Role of Cultural Intelligence and Social Capital Role in teachers Job compatibility: Testing mediating Role of Social Capital. Journal of New Educational Approaches,College of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Isfahan University,10(1), 21st period, 41-66. [ In Persian]